{"id":5591,"date":"2022-02-07T23:12:18","date_gmt":"2022-02-07T21:12:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/?p=5591"},"modified":"2022-02-08T01:48:55","modified_gmt":"2022-02-07T23:48:55","slug":"boris-johnson-smears-starmer-corbyn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/2022-02-07\/boris-johnson-smears-starmer-corbyn\/","title":{"rendered":"Didn&#8217;t those enraged at Boris Johnson\u2019s \u2018smears\u2019 of Starmer defame Corbyn at every turn?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><i>The media outrage at Johnson linking the Labour leader to Jimmy Savile is because his comments\u00a0inadvertently\u00a0exposed the dark underbelly of the British establishment<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Why is Boris Johnson making false claims about Starmer and Savile?\u201d runs a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2022\/feb\/02\/why-is-boris-johnson-making-false-claims-about-starmer-and-savile\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">headline<\/a> in the news pages of the Guardian. It is just one of a barrage of indignant recent stories in the British media, rushing to the defence of the opposition leader, Sir Keir Starmer.<\/p>\n<p>The reason? Last week the British prime minister, Boris Johnson, blamed Starmer, now the Labour party leader, for failing to prosecute\u00a0Jimmy Savile, a TV presenter and serial child abuser,\u00a0when his case came under police review in 2009. Between 2008 and 2013,\u00a0Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Savile died in 2011 before he could face justice.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson accused Starmer, who at the time was Director of Public Prosecutions, of wasting \u201chis time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The sudden chorus of outrage at Johnson impugning Starmer\u2019s reputation is strange in many different ways. It is not as though Johnson has a record of good behaviour. His whole political persona is built on the idea of his being a rascal, a clown, a chancer.<\/p>\n<p>He is also a well-documented liar. Few, least of all in the media, cared much about his pattern of lying until now. Indeed, most observers have long pointed out that his popularity was based on his mischief-making and his populist guise as an anti-establishment politician. No one, apart from his political opponents, seemed too bothered.<\/p>\n<p>And it is also not as though there are not lots of other, more critically important things relating to Johnson to be far more enraged about, even before we consider his catastrophic handling of the pandemic, and his raiding of the public coffers to enrich his crony friends and party donors.<\/p>\n<h3>Jumping ship<\/h3>\n<p>Johnson is currently embroiled in the so-called \u201cpartygate\u201d scandal. He \u00a0attended \u2013 and his closest officials appear to have organised \u2013 several gatherings at his residence in Downing Street in 2020 and 2021 at a time when the rest of the country was under strict lockdown. For the first time the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.middleeasteye.net\/opinion\/no-10-lockdown-parties-media-are-either-woefully-incompetent-or-complicitb\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">public mood has shifted<\/a> against Johnson.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">My latest: The media&#39;s watchdog role is an illusion. The current scandal over Boris Johnson&#39;s lockdown parties reveals just how dependent journalists are on government <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/BxykcG3qfc\">https:\/\/t.co\/BxykcG3qfc<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Jonathan_K_Cook\/status\/1484496603100631046?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">January 21, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>But it was Johnson\u2019s criticisms of Starmer, not partygate, that led several of his senior advisers last week to resign their posts. One can at least suspect that in their case \u2013 given how quickly the Johnson brand is sinking, and the repercussions they may face from a police investigation into the partygate scandal \u2013 that finding an honorable pretext for jumping ship may have been the wisest move.<\/p>\n<p>But there is something deeply strange about Johnson\u2019s own Conservative MPs and the British media lining up to express their indignation at Johnson\u2019s attack on Starmer, a not particularly liked or likable opposition leader, and then turning it into the reason to bring down a prime minister whose other flaws are only too visible.<\/p>\n<p>What makes the situation even weirder is that Johnson\u2019s so-called \u201csmears\u201d of Starmer may not actually be smears at all. They look like rare examples of Johnson alluding to \u2013 admittedly in his own clumsy and self-interested way \u2013 genuinely problematic behaviour by Starmer.<\/p>\n<p>One would never know this from the coverage, of course.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the Guardian supposedly fact-checking Johnson\u2019s attack on Starmer under the apparently neutral question: \u201cIs there any evidence that Starmer was involved in any decision not to prosecute Savile?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Guardian\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2022\/feb\/02\/why-is-boris-johnson-making-false-claims-about-starmer-and-savile\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">answer<\/a> is decisive:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>No. The CPS has confirmed that there is no reference to any involvement from Starmer in the decision-making within an official report examining the case.<\/p>\n<p>Surrey police consulted the CPS for advice about the allegations after interviewing Savile\u2019s victims, according to a 2013 CPS statement made by Starmer as DPP.<\/p>\n<p>The official report, written by Alison Levitt QC, found that in October 2009 the CPS lawyer responsible for the cases \u2013 who was not Starmer \u2013 advised that no prosecution could be brought on the grounds that none of the complainants were \u2018prepared to support any police action\u2019.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That\u2019s a pretty definite \u201cNo\u201d, then. Not \u201cNo, according to Starmer\u201d. Or \u201cNo, according to the CPS\u201d. Or \u201cNo, according to an official report\u201d \u2013 and doubtless a determinedly face-saving one at that \u2013 into the Savile scandal.<\/p>\n<p>Just \u201cNo\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the Guardian\u2019s political correspondent Peter Walker echoing how cut and dried the corporate media\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2022\/feb\/04\/truth-and-lies-how-honest-was-boris-johnson-this-week\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">assessment<\/a> is: \u201c[Starmer] had no connection to decisions over the case, and the idea he did emerged later in conspiracy theories mainly shared among the far right.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>So it\u2019s just a far-right conspiracy theory. Case against Starmer closed.<\/p>\n<p>But not so fast.<\/p>\n<p>Given Savile\u2019s tight ties to the establishment \u2013 from royalty and prime ministers down \u2013 and the establishment\u2019s role in providing, however inadvertently, cover for Savile\u2019s paedophilia for decades, it should hardly surprise us that the blame for the failure to prosecute him has been placed squarely on the shoulders of a low-level lawyer in the Crown Prosecution Service. How it could be otherwise? If we started unpicking the thorny Savile knot, who knows how the threads might unravel?<\/p>\n<h3>Sacrificial victim<\/h3>\n<p>Former ambassador Craig Murray has made an interesting observation about Johnson\u2019s remark on Starmer. Murray, let us remember, has been a first-hand observer and chronicler of the dark arts of the establishment in protecting itself from exposure, after he himself was made a sacrificial victim for revealing the British government\u2019s illegal involvement in torture and extraordinary rendition.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">My latest: The refusal to hear Craig Murray\u2019s appeal against his unprecedented conviction for \u2018jigsaw identification\u2019 means the British state has now effectively been given the power to license journalists <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/czxg9VNtnU\">https:\/\/t.co\/czxg9VNtnU<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Jonathan_K_Cook\/status\/1421191242659110912?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 30, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>As Murray <a href=\"https:\/\/www.craigmurray.org.uk\/archives\/2022\/02\/how-the-establishment-functions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">notes<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Of course the Director of Public Prosecutions does not handle the individual cases, which are assigned to lawyers under them. But the Director most certainly is then consulted on the decisions in the high profile and important cases.<\/p>\n<p>That is why they are there. It is unthinkable that Starmer was not consulted on the decision to shelve the Savile case \u2013 what do they expect us to believe his role was, as head of the office, ordering the paperclips?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And of the official inquiry into Starmer\u2019s role that cleared him of any wrongdoing, the one that so impresses the Guardian and everyone else, Murray adds:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When the public outcry reached a peak in 2012, Starmer played the go-to trick in the Establishment book. He commissioned an \u201cindependent\u201d lawyer he knew to write a report exonerating him. Mistakes have been made at lower levels, lessons will be learnt\u2026 you know what it says. Mishcon de Reya, money launderers to the oligarchs, provided the lawyer to do the whitewash. Once he retired from the post of DPP, Starmer went to work at, umm,&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Yes, Mischon de Reya.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Delighted to be joining Mishcon de Reya and to remain with Doughty Street Chambers under new dual capacity rules <a href=\"http:\/\/t.co\/ejoBDIxImK\">http:\/\/t.co\/ejoBDIxImK<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Keir_Starmer\/status\/481064640932098048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 23, 2014<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<h3>Starmer and Assange<\/h3>\n<p>Murray also notes that MPs and the British media have resolutely focused attention on Starmer\u2019s alleged non-role in the Savile decision \u2013 where an \u201cofficial report\u201d provides them with cover \u2013 rather than an additional, and far more embarrassing, point made by Johnson about Starmer\u2019s behaviour as Director of Public Prosecutions.<\/p>\n<p>The prime minister mentioned Starmer using his time to \u201cprosecute journalists\u201d. Johnson and the media have no interest in clarifying that reference. Anyway, Johnson only made it for effect: as a contrast to the way Starmer treated Savile, as a way to highlight that, when he chose to, Starmer was quite capable of advancing a prosecution.<\/p>\n<p>But this second point is potentially far more revealing both of Starmer\u2019s misconduct as Director of Public Prosecutions and about the services he rendered to the establishment \u2013 the likely reason why he was knighted at a relatively young age, becoming \u201cSir\u201d Keir.<\/p>\n<p>The journalist referenced by Johnson was presumably Julian Assange, currently locked up in Belmarsh high-security prison in London as lawyers try to get him extradited to the United States for his exposure of US war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>At an early stage of Assange\u2019s persecution, the Crown Prosecution Service under Starmer worked overtime \u2013 despite Britain\u2019s official position of neutrality in the case \u2013 to ensure he was extradited to Sweden. Assange sought political asylum in the Ecuadorean embassy in London in 2012, when Starmer was still head of the Crown Prosecution Service. Assange did so because he got wind of efforts by the Americans to extradite him onwards from Sweden to the US. He feared the UK would collude in that process.<\/p>\n<p>Assange, it turns out, was not wrong. With the Swedish investigation dropped long ago, the British courts are now, nearly a decade on, close to agreeing to the Biden administration\u2019s demand that Assange be extradited to the US \u2013 both to silence him and to intimidate any other journalists who might try to throw a light on US war crimes.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">My latest: It is the ultimate, ugly paradox that Julian Assange\u2019s legal and physical fate rests in the hands of two states \u2013 the US and UK \u2013 that have the most to lose by allowing him to regain his freedom and publish more of the truths they want concealed <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/M7WTKq0ZXf\">https:\/\/t.co\/M7WTKq0ZXf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Jonathan_K_Cook\/status\/1471867065178988548?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 17, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>The Italian journalist Stefania Maurizi has been pursuing a lengthy legal battle to have the CPS emails from Starmer\u2019s time released under a Freedom of Information request. She has been opposed by the British establishment every step of the way. We know that many of the email chains relating to Assange were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/media\/2018\/feb\/11\/sweden-tried-to-drop-assange-extradition-in-2013-cps-emails-show\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">destroyed<\/a> by the Crown Prosecution Service \u2013 apparently illegally. Those would doubtless have shone a much clearer light on Starmer\u2019s role in the case \u2013 possibly the reason they were destroyed.<\/p>\n<p>The small number of emails that have been retrieved show that the Crown Prosecution Service under Starmer micro-managed the Swedish investigation of Assange, even bullying Swedish prosecutors to pursue the case when they had started to lose interest for lack of evidence. In one email from 2012, a CPS lawyer <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/media\/2018\/feb\/11\/sweden-tried-to-drop-assange-extradition-in-2013-cps-emails-show\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">warned<\/a> his Swedish counterpart: \u201cDon\u2019t you dare get cold feet!!!\u201d. In another from 2011, the CPS lawyer writes: \u201cPlease do not think this case is being dealt with as just another extradition.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>Prosecutors arm-twisted<\/h3>\n<p>Again, the idea that Starmer was not intimately involved in the decision to arm-twist Swedish prosecutors into persecuting a journalist \u2013 a case that the UK should formally have had no direct interest in, unless it was covertly advancing US interests to silence Assange \u2013 beggars belief.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the media\u2019s lack of interest in Assange\u2019s plight, the energy expended by the US to get Assange behind bars in the US and redefine national security journalism as espionage shows how politically and diplomatically important this case has always been to the US \u2013 and by extension, the British establishment. There is absolutely no way the deliberations were handled by a single lawyer. Starmer would have closely overseen his staff&#8217;s dealings with Swedish prosecutors and authorised what was in practice a political decision, not legal one, to persecute Assange \u2013 or as United Nations experts defined it, \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/2016-02-06\/lies-about-un-body-imperil-not-just-assange\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">arbitrarily detain<\/a>\u201d him.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">My latest: Lies about UN body threaten not just Julian Assange <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/AKiTmP8VL5\">https:\/\/t.co\/AKiTmP8VL5<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Assange?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Assange<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/unwgad?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#unwgad<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Jonathan_K_Cook\/status\/695741764947288066?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">February 5, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>Neither Murray nor I have unique, Sherlock-type powers of deduction that allow us to join the dots in ways no one else can manage. All of this information is in the public realm, and all of it is known to the editors of the British media. They are not only choosing to avoid mentioning it in the context of the current row, but they are actively fulminating against Boris Johnson for having done so.<\/p>\n<p>The prime minister\u2019s crime isn\u2019t that he has \u201csmeared\u201d Starmer. It is that \u2013 out of desperate self-preservation \u2013 he has exposed the dark underbelly of the establishment. He has broken the elite\u2019s omerta, its vow of silence. He has made the unpardonable sin of grassing up the establishment to which he belongs. He has potentially given ammunition to the great unwashed to expose the establishment\u2019s misdeeds, to blow apart its cover story. That is why the anger is far more palpable and decisive about Johnson smearing Starmer than it ever was when Johnson smeared the rest of us by partying on through the lockdowns.<\/p>\n<h3>Scorched-earth tactic?<\/h3>\n<p>Look at this headline on Jonathan Freedland\u2019s latest column for the Guardian, visibly <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2022\/feb\/04\/boris-johnson-savile-smear-pm-power-britain\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">aquiver with anger<\/a> at the way Johnson has defamed Starmer: \u201cJohnson\u2019s Savile smear was the scorched-earth tactic of a desperate, dangerous man\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>A prime minister attacking the opposition leader \u2013 something we would normally think of as a largely unexceptional turn of political events, and all the more so under Johnson \u2013 has been transformed by Freedland into a dangerous, scorched-earth tactic.<\/p>\n<p>Quite how preposterous, and hypocritical, this claim is should not need underscoring. Who really needs to be reminded of how Freedland and the rest of media class \u2013 but especially Freedland \u2013 treated Stramer\u2019s predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn? That really was a scorched-earth approach. There was barely a day in his five years leading the Labour party when the media did not fabricate the most outrageous lies about Corbyn and his party. He was shabby and unstatesmanlike (unlike the smartly attired Johnson!), sexist, a traitor, a threat to national security, an anti-semite, and much more.<\/p>\n<p>Anyone like Freedland who actively participated in the five-year campaign of demonisation of Corbyn has no credibility whatsoever either complaining about the supposed mistreatment of Starmer (a pale shadow of what Corbyn suffered) or decrying Johnson\u2019s lowering of standards in public life.<\/p>\n<p>We have the rightwing populist Johnson in power precisely because Freedland and the rest of the media relentlessly smeared the democratic socialist alternative. In the 2017 election, let us recall, Corbyn was only 2,000 votes from winning. The concerted campaign of smears from across the entire corporate media \u2013 and the resulting manipulation of the public mood \u2013 was the difference between Corbyn winning and the Tories holding on to power.<\/p>\n<p>Corbyn was destroyed \u2013 had to be destroyed \u2013 because he threatened establishment interests. He challenged the interests of the rich, of the corporations, of the war industries, of the Israel lobby. That was why an anonymous military general <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/2015-09-20\/army-plots-against-british-pms-are-not-new\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">warned<\/a> in the pages of the establishment\u2019s newspaper, The Times, that there would be a mutiny if Corbyn ever reached 10 Downing Street. That was why soldiers were filmed using an image of Corbyn as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/uk-england-essex-48868071\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">target practice<\/a> on a firing range in Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson\u2019s desperate \u201csmears\u201d aside, none of this will ever happen to Starmer. There will be no threats of mutiny and his image will never used for target practice by the army. Sir Keir won\u2019t be defamed by the billionaire-owned media. Rather, they have demonstrated that they have his back. They will even promote him over an alumnus of the Bullingdon Club, when the blokey toff\u2019s shine starts to wear off.<\/p>\n<p>And that, it should hardly need pointing out, is because Sir Keir Starmer is there to protect not the public&#8217;s interests but the interests of the establishment, just as he did so conscientiously when he was Director of Public Prosecutions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The media outrage at Boris Johnson linking the Labour leader to Jimmy Savile is because his comments inadvertently exposed the dark underbelly of the British establishment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5188,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[18,59,6],"class_list":{"0":"post-5591","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-guardian","9":"tag-jeremy-corbyn","10":"tag-media-criticism"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5591"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5591\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5602,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5591\/revisions\/5602"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}