{"id":1342,"date":"2014-09-01T20:13:13","date_gmt":"2014-09-01T18:13:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/?p=1342"},"modified":"2014-09-06T23:33:54","modified_gmt":"2014-09-06T21:33:54","slug":"partisan-reporters-criticise-gaza-coverage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/2014-09-01\/partisan-reporters-criticise-gaza-coverage\/","title":{"rendered":"Partisan reporters criticise Gaza coverage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have noted in several previous articles the unusual, possibly unique, problem\u00a0relating to\u00a0media coverage\u00a0of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The reporting corps\u00a0is awash with &#8220;partisan reporters&#8221; \u2013 that is, Jews who have an ideological, social or familial connection and sympathy with one side, the Israeli side.<\/p>\n<p>I have no objection to\u00a0reporters having views, even strong ones, about this conflict, or any other issue in the news. I do myself. In fact, I believe journalists cannot be &#8220;objective&#8221;, as I have explained at length elsewhere. \u00a0But in the case of Israel-Palestine, many reporters are being chosen precisely for their\u00a0partisanship \u2013 and these reporters are being selected because they are partisan in one direction only. Just check how many\u00a0Palestinian reporters (I don&#8217;t mean glorified fixers or\u00a0undervalued stringers) report for the US media on the conflict.<\/p>\n<p>Editors possibly justify their policy\u00a0to themselves by assuming that Jewish reporters, especially ones\u00a0with family in Israel, will improve their access to Israeli\u00a0elites. Given the rampant chauvinism in Israel, this may be so. But it means only one side of the elite debate is being\u00a0accessed \u2013 the Israeli one.<\/p>\n<p>Illustrations\u00a0of the partisan reporter&#8217;s mindset have been thrown up afresh\u00a0in a debate about media responsibility during Israel&#8217;s attack on\u00a0Gaza. A prime example is Matti Friedman, who worked for many years at the US news agency Associated Press. AP has a pretty terrible record in its coverage of the conflict, as well as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/2006\/03\/18\/ap-erases-video-of-israeli-soldier-shooting-palestinian-boy\/\" target=\"_blank\">documented examples<\/a> of\u00a0its local staff censoring stories that reflect badly on Israel.<\/p>\n<p>Preposterously, Friedman asserts <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tabletmag.com\/jewish-news-and-politics\/183033\/israel-insider-guide\" target=\"_blank\">in his essay<\/a> for\u00a0the Tablet magazine that the media&#8217;s disproportionate interest in Israel-Palestine reflects an unhealthy and &#8220;<span style=\"color: #343434;\">hostile obsession with Jews&#8221;.<\/span>\u00a0In fact, it indicates something else entirely: the West&#8217;s long and unhealthy interest in supporting the Zionist movement&#8217;s\u00a0dispossession of the Palestinian people in their homeland, and a deep sense by Western elites of their political and military investment in the Jewish state project.<\/p>\n<p>The media&#8217;s obsession with Israel results both from Israel&#8217;s\u00a0place at the heart of\u00a0the West&#8217;s perceived strategic interests in the region and from a need to pander to influential domestic Jewish readerships. There is a reason, after all, why the New York Times is probably the most Israel-obsessed newspaper in the world outside Israel itself &#8211; and it has nothing to do with anti-Semitism.<\/p>\n<p>Most of Friedman&#8217;s article is so patently one-sided, and detached from reality, it barely warrants addressing. One needs only to read his\u00a0claim\u00a0that the big story overlooked by the media is: &#8220;<span style=\"color: #343434;\">The fact that Israelis quite recently elected moderate governments that sought reconciliation with the Palestinians&#8221;. Yes, in your dreams, Matti. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #343434;\">Similarly, Friedman apparently also knows enough Palestinians to argue that the real\u00a0story they want covering is corruption within their own society. Maybe the two Palestinians you befriended think like that, Matti, but I guess that may be a rather self-selecting group. Why do you think they befriended you? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #343434;\">As someone who has lived among Palestinians for more than a decade, I can assure you that, however much corruption there is in Palestinian society (and there certainly is), it is considered a far less pressing concern than the occupation of the West Bank, the siege of Gaza, the continuing dispossession of Jerusalem, and the abandonment of the refugees. You may think Palestinians have their priorities wrong, Matti, but there is no disputing that those <em>are<\/em> their priorities.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Friedman also wants the conflict recharacterised as a Jewish-Muslim one rather than Israeli-Palestinian. The media apparently collude in this mistaken framing. Thus, Friedman argues:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #343434;\">A knowledgeable observer of the Middle East cannot avoid the impression that the region is a volcano and that the lava is radical Islam, an ideology whose various incarnations are now shaping this part of the world. Israel is a tiny village on the slopes of the volcano.\u00a0Hamas is the local representative of radical Islam and is openly dedicated to the eradication of the Jewish minority enclave in Israel.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Except the conflict existed well before anyone had heard of Hamas, al-Qaeda or Isis. Religion was never at the root of the conflict, though Israel \u2013 hoping to\u00a0exploit Western prejudices about a\u00a0clash of civilisations \u2013\u00a0has been\u00a0working hard to make\u00a0it so.<\/p>\n<p>Friedman again:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #343434;\">Jerusalem is less than a day\u2019s drive from Aleppo or Baghdad, and it should be clear to everyone that peace is pretty elusive in the Middle East even in places where Jews are absent. But reporters generally cannot see the Israel story in relation to anything else.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But Western interests, and the resulting Western interference, Western-backed puppets, and the West&#8217;s fair-weather, Islamic allies, are never far away from wherever one is in the Middle East. <em>That<\/em> is why peace is and remains elusive. Israel is one central prong in\u00a0this Western policy of interference. The real story is that reporters like\u00a0Friedman \u2013 in fact, all reporters in the mainstream \u2013 are either oblivious to the West&#8217;s indelible impact on the region, or career-minded\u00a0enough to avoid mentioning it.<\/p>\n<p>Today in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.haaretz.com\/opinion\/.premium-1.613518\" target=\"_blank\">Haaretz commentary<\/a>, a former partisan reporter for the BBC, Richard Miron, added his support to this heavily distorted picture of media malfeasance. Being a former BBC journalist, he tries to be a little more &#8220;balanced&#8221;\u00a0in his views than Friedman, but finds nothing in Friedman&#8217;s screed from which to distance himself.<\/p>\n<p>As if confirming Friedman&#8217;s claims, Miron lambasts reporters for &#8220;emoting&#8221; on the Palestinians&#8217; behalf, citing Jon Snow of Britain&#8217;s Channel 4. \u00a0Whatever one thinks of Snow \u2013 and I think he ultimately failed his\u00a0viewers by chiefly\u00a0packaging Palestinian suffering\u00a0in Gaza in humanitarian terms \u2013 Miron, like Friedman, is grossly misrepresenting the true\u00a0picture of Western media coverage of Gaza. That rare\u00a0bout of soul-searching from one prominent presenter was but a drop in an\u00a0ocean of wall-to-wall sympathy for Israel in the US media. The story there echoed the assumption\u00a0of President Barack Obama that Israel has a\u00a0right to defend itself &#8230; from Palestinian resistance to decades of Israel&#8217;s belligerent occupation and an eight-year siege of Gaza. That part of the story was hardly ever mentioned, even by Snow.<\/p>\n<p>Miron does\u00a0make one\u00a0sensible observation:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>K<span style=\"color: #000000;\">nowing Gaza\u2019s physical geography, it\u2019s safe to conclude that if Hamas operatives did come out from the territory\u2019s packed urban confines, they would have been quickly struck by an Israeli drone or aircraft fire.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But blinded by his partisanship for Israel, he then wants to use this observation to support Israel&#8217;s story that Palestinians in Gaza were being used as &#8220;human\u00a0shields&#8221;. He\u00a0specifically criticises BBC Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen for writing that\u00a0<span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u201che saw no evidence &#8230; of Israel\u2019s accusation that Hamas uses Palestinians as human shields\u201d<\/span>. But contrary to Miron&#8217;s assumption,\u00a0avoiding\u00a0committing suicide (on\u00a0a\u00a0battlefield determined\u00a0by Israel&#8217;s siege policy) is not the same as turning other Palestinians into\u00a0human shields. At least Bowen understands that obvious point, even if\u00a0Miron, blinded by his partisanship, cannot.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have noted in several previous articles the unusual, possibly unique, problem\u00a0relating to\u00a0media coverage\u00a0of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The reporting corps\u00a0is awash with &#8220;partisan reporters&#8221; \u2013 that is, Jews who have an ideological, social or familial connection and sympathy with one side, the Israeli side. I have no objection to\u00a0reporters having views, even strong ones, about [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,6,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-1342","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"tag-bbc","8":"tag-media-criticism","9":"tag-media-on-israel"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1342"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1342\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jonathan-cook.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}